“There isn't any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of your present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din saw firstly the deceased and after far they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, did not indicate that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. This kind of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of last viewed.

Some sites may possibly specialize in specific areas of legislation, although others offer a broader database. Factors to take into account when choosing a website consist of the comprehensiveness of the database, the benefit of navigation, as well as the availability of advanced search options.

4.       Record shows that the petitioner is booked in as much as eight criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the moment case. Regardless that the petitioner has obtained bail in These cases, it does, prima facie, build that the petitioner is vulnerable to repeating the offence.

Even though there is not any prohibition against referring to case regulation from a state other than the state in which the case is being listened to, it holds little sway. Still, if there is not any precedent within the home state, relevant case law from another state could be regarded as via the court.

ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is very well-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 times. If your appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she can then method the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, given that the ninety times with the department to act has already expired. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been guided through the decision with the Supreme Court while in the case of Dr.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim click here Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, Additionally it is a perfectly-set up proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is matter to the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-appreciate the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.

                                                                  

whether even though granting promotion senior employees were viewed as for promotion or otherwise and submit the compliance report.(Promotion)

Case legislation, also used interchangeably with common legislation, can be a law that is based on precedents, that will be the judicial decisions from previous cases, somewhat than regulation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case legislation uses the detailed facts of the legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.

This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a nearby electricity grid station because of opportunity health risks and hazards.

The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to generally be gathered through the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

three. Rule of Law: The court reiterated the importance of upholding the rule of legislation and making certain that all institutions function within their constitutional mandates.

13309-B of 2010 to become weak types of evidence along with the evidentiary value whereof would be seen with the time with the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Hence, confirmed custody of your petitioner in jail is not going to serve any valuable purpose at this stage.”

These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory law, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are proven by executive agencies based on statutes.